Legal Opinion

Phillips v. Rolston

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 4, 1965No. Calendar 12, Docket 50,787PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSouris, J.

The principal question presented to us in this appeal is whether the ad damnum clause of a complaint may be amended to increase it to conform with the amount awarded by the jury.

Plaintiff sued for his damages resulting when defendants’ automobile collided with the rear end of plaintiff’s automobile. The ad damnum clause in his complaint was for $30,000. The jury returned á verdict in the amount of $35,000. Following the jury’s verdict, but before entry of judgment thereon, the trial judge granted plaintiff’s motion to amend his ad damnum clause to conform with the $35,000 awarded him by the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Zeilman v. FryMichigan Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Cicotte v. County of WayneMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Kenyon v. WoodwardMichigan Supreme Court · 1868

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Precopio v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Jones v. MorganMichigan Court of Appeals · 1975
  3. Tomei v. Bloom Associates, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1977
  4. Fred Gibbs, Inc. v. Old Colony InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1971
  5. Gibeault v. City of Highland ParkMichigan Court of Appeals · 1973

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API