Toledo Bar Ass'n v. Lockhart
Ohio Supreme Court
1Per curiam
We adopt the findings and conclusions of the board. Respondent’s shoplifting violated DR 1-102(A)(4). Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Fidler (1998), 83 Ohio St.3d 396, 700 N.E.2d 323.
*9In view of respondent’s attempts to rehabilitate herself, we adopt the recommendation of the panel. Respondent is hereby suspended from the practice of law for two years, with one year of that suspension stayed. Respondent will be placed on probation, and her reinstatement will be conditioned on her payment of all fines and other costs related to her actions. Upon completion of the suspension, she shall submit to a…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. FidlerOhio Supreme Court · 1998
3Cited by7 opinions
- Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. MooreOhio Supreme Court · 2015
- Toledo Bar Assn. v. LockhartOhio Supreme Court · 1998
- Toledo Bar Ass'n v. LockhartOhio Supreme Court · 2002
- Disciplinary Counsel v. NilesOhio Supreme Court · 2010
- In Re: Elise Marybeth LamartinaSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2017
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.