Legal Opinion

France v. Bell

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 1897No. 7206PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from the district court of York county. Heard below before Bates, J.

1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.

This action was instituted in the district court of York county to foreclose a mortgage on lot numbered 2, in block numbered 25, in the village of York, York county, Nebraska, which had been given to secure to appellant the payment of a promissory note in the principal sum' of $100. In the answer it was stated:

“Comes now the defendant Amanda M. Bell, and for *58answer to the petition filed against her in said cause says that she has never seen the note set forth and described in the plaintiff’s petition to her knowledge; that the original note, if such note exist, is in the possession of the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Whitlock v. GossonNebraska Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Giles v. MillerNebraska Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Aultman & Taylor Co. v. JenkinsNebraska Supreme Court · 1886
  4. Swift v. DeweyNebraska Supreme Court · 1886
  5. Bonorden & Ranck v. KrizNebraska Supreme Court · 1882

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Wells v. ShriverSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  2. Marquam v. RossOregon Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Hobson v. HuxtableNebraska Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Interstate Savings & Loan Ass'n v. StrineNebraska Supreme Court · 1899
  5. National Brake & Electric Co. v. ChristensenCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1919

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API