Legal Opinion

In re Est. of Womack

Utah Supreme Court

Decided June 23, 2017No. Case No. 20160544Published

1Opinion of the Court

On Certiorari to the Utah Court of Appeals

Justice Himonas,

opinion of the Court:

INTRODUCTION

¶ 1 This case arises out of a provision in Gordon Warren Womack’s will that left a life estate in oil, gas, and mineral properties to his children, with the remainder to his grandchildren. Twenty-two years after Gordon Womack’s estate was settled, one of his sons lodged a petition to reopen the estate and to interpret the provision, arguing that it had not been construed in past district court orders regarding his father’s estate and, therefore, was not barred by a statute of limitations. We disagree…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Becton Dickinson and Co. v. ReeseUtah Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Johnson v. JohnsonUtah Supreme Court · 2014
  3. CIG Exploration, Inc. v. StateUtah Supreme Court · 2001
  4. First Security Bank of Utah, N.A. v. MaxwellUtah Supreme Court · 1983
  5. In re Estate of WomackCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API