Zap v. Newport Mining Co.
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Gogebic; Cooper, J. Case by Mike Zap against the Newport Mining Company for personal'injuries. Judgment for defendant upon a directed verdict. Plaintiff brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtOstrander, J.
It is the claim of the plaintiff that while he was employed by defendant as a trammer, in. March, 1912, a quantity of earth and ore fell upon him, some of it entering into and irritating his eyes. As a result they became infected; the vision of one of them is greatly impaired; and a chronic inflammation of the eyelids (trachoma) exists. He sued for damages for his alleged injuries, and when, upon the trial of his case, the plaintiff had rested, the court, *438upon the motion of defendant’s counsel, directed a verdict for defendant, upon which judgment' was rendered. In directing the verdict, the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Lake Superior Iron Co. v. EricksonMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
- Scendar v. Winona Copper Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1912
- Koskell v. Newport Mining Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1914
3Cited by2 opinions
- Kangas v. Cleveland Cliffs Iron Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1915
- Vrelenich v. Calumet & Hecla Mining Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1915