Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Booth v. Tatro

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 29, 1939No. 27504. Department OnePublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSteinert, J.

The owner of certain matured, but unpaid, local improvement district bonds of the city of Olympia brought this action in mandamus to compel the city treasurer to pay the amount of the bonds out of moneys standing to the credit of the city’s local improvement revolving fund. Trial by the court resulted in findings and conclusions, based upon which a judgment dismissing the action was entered. The owner of the bonds prosecutes this appeal.

The questions presented for consideration relate to the legal status of the local improvement revolving fund and to the rights of owners of local improvement…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. City of Seattle v. StirratWashington Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Mooney v. Mooney Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1912
  3. State Ex Rel. National Bank v. City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Wechner v. DorchesterWashington Supreme Court · 1915
  5. State ex rel. McMannis v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1916

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. King County Employees' Ass'n v. State Employees' Retirement BoardWashington Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Lynn v. City of LongviewWashington Supreme Court · 1942
  3. King County Employees' Ass'n v. State Employees' Retirement BoardWashington Supreme Court · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API