Legal Opinion

Metropolitan Life Insurance v. Gorman-Hubka

District Court, E.D. Virginia

Decided February 3, 2016No. Case No. 1:15-cv-1200Published

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

T. S. Ellis, III, United States District Judge

In this interpleader action, claimants dispute who is entitled to receive the benefits of decedent’s life insurance policy. Plaintiff, the stakeholder, filed an inter-pleader complaint for the purpose of determining the rightful beneficiary. Thereafter, claimants filed answers and cross-claims against each other. Claimant Judith Gor-man-Hubka also filed a counterclaim against plaintiff, alleging two claims. Claimants then filed cross-motions for summary judgment with respect to their cross-claims. As the motions have been fully…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Egelhoff v. Egelhoff Ex Rel. BreinerSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  2. Raymond B. Yates, MD, PC Profit Sharing Plan v. HendonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. Phoenix Mutual Life Insurance Company v. William Jackson Adams, Iv, Rosita L. AdamsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1994
  4. Maryland Casualty Company v. Scott Nelson Burley, Jr., Donald Pete Mosteller and National Indemnity CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1965
  5. United Services Life Insurance v. MossDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 1969

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API