Ramapo Mountains Water, Power & Service Co. v. Seidler

Judgment affirmed, with costs. The court reverses the third conclusion of law, to wit, that the commencement of condemnation proceedings by the defendant park commissioners did not constitute an appropriation of the land sought to be acquired for park purposes under the statute. Also the finding of fact contained in the last sentence of the seventeenth finding of fact, as follows: “ That said defendant, Commissioners of the Palisades Interstate Park, did not select and locate and have not selected and located the lands described and referred to in said instruments (Defendants’ Exhibits A, B,…