Legal Opinion

Boatman v. Thomas

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Decided January 8, 1971No. Civ-70-190PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MUIR, District Judge.

This case arises out of an automobile accident in Pennsylvania in which the Defendant, a New York resident, was involved. Suit was instituted against the Defendant under the name of Dann G. Thomas. His name actually is George Thomas Dann. The United States Marshall mailed the summons and complaint to the Secretary of the Commonwealth as agent for the Defendant, and to the Defendant under the misnomer. The postal receipt was executed by “Mrs. George M. Dann” on behalf of the Defendant.

Defendant moves to dismiss under Rule 12(b) (5), Fed.R.Civ.Pro., on the ground…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. A. H. Fischer Lumber Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1947
  2. C. S. Grandey v. Pacific Indemnity CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1954
  3. Longsdorf v. Pennsylvania Greyhound Lines, Inc.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1956

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Ingram v. KumarCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
  2. C & C Tile Co. v. Independent Sch. Dist. No. 7 of Tulsa Cty.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1972
  3. United States v. KatesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1976
  4. Ingram v. KumarCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
  5. Patten v. City of WaterlooSupreme Court of Iowa · 1977

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API