Legal Opinion
City of Teague v. Radford
Texas Commission of Appeals
Decided October 4, 1933No. 1696—6209PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CRITZ, Judge.
This suit was instituted in the district court of Freestone county, Tex., by R. G. Radford, against the city of Teague, a municipal corporation, organized under the General Laws of this state, to recover damages for personal injuries received by Rad-ford while employed by the city as the superintendent of its municipal waterworks. Rad-ford alleges that he was personally injured by the bursting of an air compressor, which was a part of the machinery of the waterworks plant. Trial in the district court resulted in a judgment for Radford in the sum of $5,400. This judgment was…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Allen v. G. W. & F. Smith Iron Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1894
- Broderick v. St. Paul City Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1898
- Watson v. H. & T. C. R'y Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1883
- Drum v. New England Cotton Yarn Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1901
- City of Teague v. RadfordCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- City of Beaumont v. GrahamTexas Supreme Court · 1969
- Howard v. Foster & Kleiser Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1958
- City of Brady, Texas v. Tommy FinkleaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1968
- City of Edmond v. WashamSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
- Schmidt v. Multnomah Operating Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1936
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.