Legal Opinion

Shackman v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided March 8, 1951No. C. D. 1309PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Rao, Judge:

Plaintiff herein seeks to recover duties alleged to have been illegally assessed upon certain Easter ornaments of paper. The collector of customs at the port of New York classified this-merchandise as manufactures of paper, not specially provided for, and assessed duty thereon at the rate of 35 per centum ad valorem, as provided for in paragraph 1413 of the Tariff Act of 1930. The claim in each of the pending protests is that these articles are in fact boxes which fall within the provision in said paragraph 1413 for “boxes, composed wholly or in chief value of paper, papier-máché…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. United States v. SchwartzU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1896

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Keuffel v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1955
  2. A. Newberg & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1952
  3. A. Newburg & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1952
  4. B. Shackman & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1961
  5. B. Shackman & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1951

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API