Legal Opinion

Salhany v. Van Sickle

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided March 3, 1926No. 1092PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

This case was tried in Summit Common Pleas on an agreed statement of facts as follows:

Van Sickle commenced action against one James A. Salhany in Akron Municipal Court for damages arising out of an automobile accident; that summons was mailed him to his address; that he filed answer; that trial was had and it was determined that.Essa Salhany, plaintiff in this action was the driver of said automobile, that at the conclusion of the evidence, James A. Salhany moved for dismissal; that Van Sickle moved to substitute the name of Essa Salhany as defendant, that court allowed such motion and…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hennon v. Bernard Construction Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1963
  2. Gibbons v. SommersMercer County Court of Common Pleas · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API