Legal Opinion

James E. Walker v. Railroad Retirement Board

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided December 30, 1994No. 93-70436Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

46 F.3d 1149

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.

James E. WALKER, Petitioner,

v.

RAILROAD RETIREMENT BOARD, Respondent.

No. 93-70436.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted Dec. 14, 1994.

Decided Dec. 30, 1994.

Before: HUG, CANBY and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges.

1

MEMORANDUM*

2

We are compelled to affirm by the limited scope of review. The only close issue is…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ronald M. Sones v. United States of America Railroad Retirement BoardCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1991
  2. Alfonso Calderon v. United States Railroad Retirement BoardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API