James E. Walker v. Railroad Retirement Board
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
46 F.3d 1149
NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
James E. WALKER, Petitioner,
v.
RAILROAD RETIREMENT BOARD, Respondent.
No. 93-70436.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Argued and Submitted Dec. 14, 1994.
Decided Dec. 30, 1994.
Before: HUG, CANBY and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges.
1
MEMORANDUM*
2
We are compelled to affirm by the limited scope of review. The only close issue is…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Ronald M. Sones v. United States of America Railroad Retirement BoardCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1991
- Alfonso Calderon v. United States Railroad Retirement BoardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986