Muriel B. Seymour and David Seymour, Plaintiffs-Appellees-Cross-Appellants v. Summa Vista Cinema, Inc., Defendants-Appellants-Cross-Appellees
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
KOZINSKI, Circuit Judge:
Facts
Appellees, Muriel B. Seymour and her son David Seymour, sued a variety of defendants for securities fraud in connection with the purchase of stock in Summa Vista Cinema, Inc. (Summa Vista). Claiming violations of federal securities law and common law fraud, they sought compensatory and punitive damages. The Seymours took a default judgment against J.R. Shestak III, the broker who actually induced the purchase, and entered into a settlement agreement with Summa Vista and related defendants. They then proceeded to trial against Shestak’s employer, appellant J.…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Linn v. United Plant Guard Workers of America, Local 114Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
- McKinley v. City of EloyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- Donovan v. Penn Shipping Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Zweig v. Hearst Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
- 999, a Corporation, Plaintiff/appellee/cross-Appellant v. C.I.T. Corporation, a Corporation, Defendant/appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by50 opinions
- Louis P. Singer, as Successor in Interest to Troster, Singer & Co., Cross-Appellant v. Olympia Brewing Company, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
- Louis Gorenc v. Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement and Power DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- Los Angeles Police Protective League v. GatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- Murillo v. Rite Stuff Foods, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1998
- Pershing Park Villas Homeowners Ass'n v. United Pacific InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.