Legal Opinion

Fremont v. Stone

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 2, 1864PublishedCited by 5 opinions

APPEAL from an order made at a special term denying a motion to dissolve the injunction.

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court,

Clerke, J.

This action is brought to compel the specific performance of an agreement by which some of the defendants stipulated with the plaintiff that on payment by him of $200,000 for a certain number, of shares of the stock of the Union Pacific Railway Company, then belonging to them, new directors, to be nominated by the plaintiff and his co-purchaser Hallett, should be substituted in the place of all the other directors, except Fremont and Hallett, who also were directors at the time. LThat is, the vendors of this stock undertook to change the board of directors of the…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Essex Universal Corporation v. Herbert J. YatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1962
  2. Sheppard v. Rockingham Power Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1909
  3. Barnes v. BrownNew York Supreme Court · 1877
  4. Essex Universal Corporation v. Herbert J. YatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1962
  5. Vanderbilt v. BennettNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1887

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API