Legal Opinion

Lloyd v. Alexander

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided February 10, 1803PublishedCited by 7 opinions

The writ of error in this case was quashed because it was not accompanied by a citation.

1Opinion of the Court

Marshall, Chief justice.

The law respecting the thirty days notice on a writ of error, and the ten days allowed for filing it, was predicated upon the existing state of things at the time of passing the act; at which time there was no circuit court whose term would not be finished more than forty days before the setting of the supreme court.

The times of the session of the courts have been altered, but no alteration has been made in the law respecting the thirty days notice, which makes it difficult to form a rule in the case.

At present, if the citation has not been served thirty days, the…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Kitchen v. RandolphSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  2. Villabolos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1848
  3. Gayleen S. Todd v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2015
  4. Gerald Stevens v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2015
  5. McDade, David KentCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2015

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API