Legal Opinion

Albert v. Twohig

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided November 2, 1892PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Appeal from the district court for Dakota county. Heard below before Norris, J.

1Opinion of the Court

Maxwell, Ch. J.

Contestant alleges that he is an elector of Dakota co.unty, competent to bring the action; that James P. Twohig is the duly elected, qualified, and acting county clerk of Dakota county; that fm. Taylor, M. Beacon, and J. O. Fisher are duly elected, qualified, and acting board of commissioners of said county; that E. B. Wilbur, E. L. Wilbur, and C. D. Smiley are residents and electors of said county, and as such, with certain other electors, to the number of th'irtyfive, signed a petition which was filed on the 13th of August, 1891, in the office of the county clerk of Dakota…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Budd v. HoldenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1865
  2. Hudson v. SolomonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1877
  3. State ex rel. Jones v. County CommissionersNebraska Supreme Court · 1877
  4. White v. City of LincolnNebraska Supreme Court · 1877
  5. State ex rel. Wells v. MarstonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1870

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Edwards v. LoganCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1902
  2. Davenport v. OlerichSupreme Court of Iowa · 1897
  3. Moon v. HarrisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
  4. Moss v. HuntSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  5. City of Central City v. MarquisNebraska Supreme Court · 1905

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API