Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Nelson v. Hawaiian Homes Commission

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided June 28, 2013No. SCWC-30110Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Concurring and Dissenting Opinion by

ACOBA, J.

In this jurisdiction, the private attorney general doctrine was recognized in In re Water Use Permit Applications 96 Hawai'i 27, 30, 25 P.3d 802, 805 (2001) (Waiahole II). Waiahole II relied extensively on Serrano v. Priest, 20 Cal.3d 25, 141 Cal.Rptr. 315, 569 P.2d 1303, 1313-14 (1977). Serrano established the three-part test this court has adopted as determinative of whether the private attorney general doctrine applies.1 141 Cal.Rptr. 315, 569 P.2d at 1314. The majority determines that Respondents/Plaintiffs-Appellants Richard Nelson III, Kaliko…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  3. Serrano v. PriestCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Pele Defense Fund v. PatyHawaii Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Bush v. WatsonHawaii Supreme Court · 1996

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API