Forsberg v. City of Chicago
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtJustice McNAMARA
Plaintiffs filed four separate actions against defendants, the city of Chicago and its various officers, challenging the constitutionality of the Chicago boat-mooring tax. Plaintiffs appeal from trial court orders dismissing their actions on various grounds. The four actions were consolidated on appeal.
The mooring tax was enacted by the Chicago city council December 27, 1983, and was to be effective January 1, 1984. It reads, in relevant part:
“200.8 — 2.A. A tax is hereby imposed upon any watercraft moored or docked for a fee in any harbor, river or other body of water within the corporate…
2Cases cited46 opinions
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Shapiro v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Dunn v. BlumsteinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Village of Belle Terre v. BoraasSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Lehnhausen v. Lake Shore Auto Parts Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Allegro Services, Ltd. v. Metropolitan Pier & Exposition AuthorityIllinois Supreme Court · 1996
- Kapoor v. Fujisawa Pharmaceutical Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1998
- Nolan v. HillardAppellate Court of Illinois · 1999
- Schnitzer v. O'CONNORAppellate Court of Illinois · 1995
- Doutt v. Ford Motor Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1995
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.