Legal Opinion

Westfall v. . the Hudson River Fire Insurance Co.

New York Court of Appeals

Decided March 5, 1855PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.]

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] I am of opinion that by the true construction of the provisions of this policy, the use of camphene as a light in stores or warehouses, where such buildings or personal property contained in such buildings are insured, is prohibited. The policy declares that the carrying on of any of the occupations mentioned in the hazardous,…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bastian v. British American Assurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Ertischek v. New Hampshire Fire InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1917

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API