Lamb v. Heiligers
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
DOWD, Judge.
Plaintiff appeals from a judgment entered after a jury found in favor of the defendants in an action for personal injuries arising from an automobile collision. We affirm.
The plaintiff claims that the trial court erred in: (1) allowing defendants’ investigator to explain measurements of damages on photo-copies of the autos involved; (2) in submitting a contributory negligence instruction; (8) in withdrawing the issue of lost wages from the jury; (4) in not permitting the plaintiff to call the defendant Heil-igers as an adverse witness; (5) in not permitting plaintiff’s witnesses…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Wells v. GoforthSupreme Court of Missouri · 1969
- Frank v. Wabash Railroad CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1956
- Wilkins v. Cash Register Service CompanyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1975
- Alaska Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. HoffmanMissouri Court of Appeals · 1972
- Hutchinson v. SteinkeMissouri Court of Appeals · 1962
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Ransom v. Adams Dairy Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1985
- Stogsdill v. General American Life Insurance Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1976
- Hutchings Ex Rel. Hutchings v. RolingMissouri Court of Appeals · 2006
- Waters v. BarbeMissouri Court of Appeals · 1991
- Dick v. Scott Construction Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1976
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.