Legal Opinion

Lamb v. Heiligers

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided December 16, 1975No. 36330PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DOWD, Judge.

Plaintiff appeals from a judgment entered after a jury found in favor of the defendants in an action for personal injuries arising from an automobile collision. We affirm.

The plaintiff claims that the trial court erred in: (1) allowing defendants’ investigator to explain measurements of damages on photo-copies of the autos involved; (2) in submitting a contributory negligence instruction; (8) in withdrawing the issue of lost wages from the jury; (4) in not permitting the plaintiff to call the defendant Heil-igers as an adverse witness; (5) in not permitting plaintiff’s witnesses…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Wells v. GoforthSupreme Court of Missouri · 1969
  2. Frank v. Wabash Railroad CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1956
  3. Wilkins v. Cash Register Service CompanyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1975
  4. Alaska Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. HoffmanMissouri Court of Appeals · 1972
  5. Hutchinson v. SteinkeMissouri Court of Appeals · 1962

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Ransom v. Adams Dairy Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1985
  2. Stogsdill v. General American Life Insurance Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1976
  3. Hutchings Ex Rel. Hutchings v. RolingMissouri Court of Appeals · 2006
  4. Waters v. BarbeMissouri Court of Appeals · 1991
  5. Dick v. Scott Construction Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1976

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API