Legal Opinion

Kaiser v. Fishman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 14, 1988PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In consolidated actions, inter alia, to recover damages for breach of contract and breach of warranties (action No. 1) and to foreclose a mortgage (action No. 2), (1) Jack Fishman appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Orgera, J.), entered July *4572, 1985, as, after a nonjury trial, inter alia, is in favor of Jay A. Kaiser in the principal sum of $6,721.30, and declared the purchase-money mortgage formerly due from Kaiser to Fish-man be deemed satisfied, and (2) Kaiser cross-appeals from the same judgment on the ground of inadequacy, and…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. In re AhoNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
  2. Walker v. SheldonNew York Court of Appeals · 1961
  3. Jacob & Youngs, Inc. v. KentNew York Court of Appeals · 1921
  4. Bellizzi v. Huntley Estates, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1957
  5. Losei Realty Corp. v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1930

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Brushton-Moira Central School District v. Fred H. Thomas Associates, P. C.New York Court of Appeals · 1998
  2. Kaiser v. FishmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  3. Kaufman v. Le Curt Construction Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  4. Brushton-Moira Central School District v. Alliance Wall Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  5. Marketing Specialists, Inc. v. BruniDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1989

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API