Legal Opinion

Read v. Moe

District Court, W.D. Washington

Decided September 27, 2012No. Case No. C10-1010RAJPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

RICHARD A. JONES, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

This matter comes before the court on two motions to dismiss from Defendant Frekhaug Stal AS, as well as Plaintiffs two motions to compel discovery related to the motions to dismiss. Dkt. ##45, 47, 51, 68. Although the parties requested oral argument, oral argument is unnecessary in light of the court’s disposition today. For the reasons stated below, the court DENIES Frekhaug Stal’s motions to dismiss (Dkt. ## 45, 47) and GRANTS Plaintiffs motions to compel (Dkt. ## 51, 68). This order concludes with instructions for the parties to…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Asahi Metal Industry Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., Solano Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Schwarzenegger v. Fred Martin Motor Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  5. East River Steamship Corp. v. Transamerica Delaval Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Johnson ex rel. Estate of Blackmon v. Chrysler Canada Inc.District Court, N.D. Alabama · 2014
  2. Sectra Communications AB v. Absolute Software IncDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API