Legal Opinion

Valle v. Office of District Attorney

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 18, 1995PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Walter Tolub, J.), entered on or about December 22, 1994, which denied plaintiff’s motion for, inter alia, a default judgment, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The IAS Court correctly denied plaintiff’s pro se motion for a default judgment on the grounds that service of defendants’ answer was made upon plaintiff’s former attorney prior to his discharge from the case. In any event, even if plaintiff had discharged her attorney, her failure to notify defendants of *259such discharge precludes her present claim. We also note plaintiff has failed to show any…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Bob v. CohenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
  2. Bob v. CohenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  3. Bob v. CohenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
  4. Bob v. CohenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API