Legal Opinion

Artis v. Gaither

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided March 12, 1991No. A90A2081PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Birdsong, Presiding Judge.

We granted an application by Raymond Artis and Josephine Freeman, the appellants, to bring an interlocutory appeal from an or der granting summary judgment to the Motors Insurance Company (“MIC”), Freeman’s uninsured motorist insurance carrier, because there was no service of process upon MIC within the period of the statute of limitation. See Vaughn v. Collum, 236 Ga. 582 (224 SE2d 416).

“Because a grant of summary judgment is subject to direct ap peal [compare Williams v. Thomas, 183 Ga. App. 51 (1) (357 SE2 872); and Peeples v. City of Atlanta, 189 Ga. App. 888 (1)…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Vaughn v. CollumSupreme Court of Georgia · 1976
  2. Peeples v. City of AtlantaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1989
  3. Williams v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1987
  4. Terrell v. City Wide Cab, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1986

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bakhtiarnejad v. Cox Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2000
  2. Southeastern Security Insurance v. Empire Banking Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API