Legal Opinion

Hutchinson v. King

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided June 16, 1941No. 13692PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Jenkins, Justice.

1. Although it is the statutory rule that “a deed or bill of sale, absolute on its face and accompanied with possession of the property, shall not be proved, at the instance of the parties, by parol evidence to be a mortgage only, unless fraud in its procurement shall be the issue to be tried” (Code, § 67-104; Brown v. Carmichael, 149 Ga. 548 (2), 101 S. E. 124; Berry v. Royal, 152 Ga. 425, 427, 110 S. E. 167), and this rule applies where it is sought “to show by parol that [a] deed absolute in form was in fact a deed to secure a debt” (Wilkes v. Carter, 149 Ga. 240 (2), 99…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Mercer v. MorganSupreme Court of Georgia · 1911
  2. Askew v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1907
  3. Manget Realty Co. v. Carolina Realty Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1929
  4. Simpson v. RaySupreme Court of Georgia · 1935
  5. Brown v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of Georgia · 1919

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Johnson v. SherrerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1944
  2. Swofford v. GlazeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1951
  3. Moore v. WellsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1956
  4. Haynes v. BlackwellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1974
  5. Cohen v. GlassSupreme Court of Georgia · 1969

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API