Legal Opinion

Sullivan v. Naiman

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided June 17, 1943PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Heher, J.

Plaintiffs sued to recover damages for negligence in the performance of an undertaking by defendant Naiman to make certain repairs and adjustments to an oil burner set up in their dwelling house in Roselle Park. The house was damaged by lire. Conrad was Naiman’s servant assigned to do the work. The District Court Judge, sitting without a jury, resolved the issue in favor of plaintiffs; and defendants appeal from the consequent judgment.

The first point made is that there was error in the denial of defendants’ motion for a nonsuit on the ground…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Luckenbach v. W. J. McCahan Sugar Refining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1918

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. C & C Tile Co. v. Independent Sch. Dist. No. 7 of Tulsa Cty.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1972
  2. Bolton v. ZieglerDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1953
  3. George L. Schnader, Jr., Inc. v. Cole Building Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1964
  4. Pa. Mfrs. Assn. Ins. Co. v. Gov't Emp. Ins. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1975
  5. A & B AUTO STORES v. City of NewarkNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1968

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API