Legal Opinion

Grove v. School District of Spring Township

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 20, 1910No. Appeal, No. 78Published

Appeal, No. 78, Oct. T., 1909, by defendant, from order of Q. S. Centre Co., Feb. Sessions, 1908, No. 5-8, making absolute rule on school directors to enter into a contract for the tuition of pupils of a neighboring high school in case of A. C. Grove et al. v. School District of Spring Township.

Read the full summary

Appeal, No. 78, Oct. T., 1909, by defendant, from order of Q. S. Centre Co., Feb. Sessions, 1908, No. 5-8, making absolute rule on school directors to enter into a contract for the tuition of pupils of a neighboring high school in case of A. C. Grove et al. v. School District of Spring Township. Rule to show cause why the school directors of Spring township should not make a contract with the school directors of Bellefonte borough for the tuition of pupils resident in Spring township in the high school of the borough. Before Orvis, P. J. The facts are stated in the opinion of the Superior…

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Rice, P. J.,

Upon the petition of certain citizens and taxpayers of the *66township of Spring the court of quarter sessions granted a rule upon the school directors of the township “to show cause why they should not consent to- and enter into an arrangement with the school board of Bellefonte borough for the admission of petitioners’ children in the schools of the borough of Bellefonte, including the high schools of said borough, at the expense of the district of Spring township school district, and why said directors of Spring township school district should not promptly make…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Freeman v. School DirectorsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1861

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API