Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Sheeks v. Fillion

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided January 7, 1892No. 428PublishedCited by 5 opinions

From the Lawrence Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Black, J. —

This was a claim against a decedent’s estate. It is contended on behalf of the appellants that the court erred in overruling their motion to strike out a part of the claim, or complaint. This motion is not made part of the record by bill of exceptions or order of court. Therefore, this action of the court below is not so presented that this court can consider it. Section 650, R. S. 1881 ; Weston v. Lumley, 33 Ind. 486 ; Greensburgh, etc., T. P. Co. v. Sidener, 40 Ind. 424 ; Wilson v. Piper, 77 Ind. 437 ; Owens v. Tague, ante, p. 245.

It is next insisted by the appellants that the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Greensburgh, Milford, & Hope Turnpike Co. v. SidenerIndiana Supreme Court · 1872
  2. Taggart v. TevannyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1891
  3. Weston v. LumleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1870
  4. Castetter v. State ex rel. BradburnIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  5. Sandford Tool & Fork Co. v. MullenIndiana Court of Appeals · 1891

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Cooper v. GriffinIndiana Court of Appeals · 1895
  2. Board of Commissioners v. ScottIndiana Court of Appeals · 1898
  3. People's State Bank v. RuxerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1906
  4. Vaught v. Estate of BarnesIndiana Court of Appeals · 1901
  5. Estate of Le Clerc, Superior Court of California, County of San Francisco1887

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API