Legal Opinion

Aster v. Goord

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 25, 2001PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.

As the result of two urinalysis tests, which were positive for opiates, petitioner was charged with using a controlled substance and, after a tier III hearing, he was found guilty of the charge. A review of the record reveals no support for petitioner’s claim that the Hearing Officer was biased and predisposed to finding him guilty (see, Matter of Nicholas v…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Nicholas v. SchriverAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  2. Vicioso v. GoordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  3. Russo v. GoordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  4. Smith v. CoughlinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  5. Vadala v. SelskyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Melluzzo v. SelskyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  2. Woods v. SelskyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API