Legal Opinion

Patterson v. McNeill-Patterson & Associates, Inc.

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided January 24, 1994No. 2121Published

1Opinion of the Court

Goolsby, Judge:

Plaintiff Larry M. Patterson appeals from the trial court’s grant of a jury trial pursuant to Rule 39(b), SCRCP, to defendant McNeill-Patterson. We affirm.1

Patterson filed a summons on February 26, 1991, and an amended complaint on April 22, 1992, requesting a nonjury trial. In its answer, McNeill-Patterson made no demand for a *472jury trial either by endorsing the demand upon the pleading or by serving the demand in writing within ten days after service of the last pleading in accordance with Rule 38(b), SCRCP.

On April 7, 1992, McNeill-Patterson moved for a jury trial, asserting…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hannah v. United Refrigeration Services, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API