Legal Opinion

Plumb v. Ruffin

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided January 14, 1983No. 81-756PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHastings, J.

The defendant, Phillip G. Ruffin, doing business as Town and Country Market, has appealed from an order of the District Court which enjoined him from constructing a convenience store on his property. Certain protective covenants affecting such property prohibited commercial developments. He assigns as error, first, that the plaintiffs themselves are also in violation of the protective covenants and therefore have no standing in equity to bring this action, and, second, that the property has become commercial in nature notwithstanding the protective covenants.

The plaintiffs, Robert B. and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Southwest Petroleum Co. v. LoganSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
  2. Pool v. DenbeckNebraska Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Reed v. WilliamsonNebraska Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Wessel v. Hillsdale Estates, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1978

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Pollock v. RamirezNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1994
  2. Egan v. Catholic Bishop of LincolnNebraska Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Persimmon Hill First Homes Ass'n v. LonsdaleCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2003
  4. Roadrunner Development, Inc. v. SimsNebraska Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Walters v. ColfordNebraska Supreme Court · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API