Legal Opinion
Pena v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided September 12, 2003No. 5D02-4080PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
853 So.2d 1120 (2003)
Ana M. PENA, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 5D02-4080.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
September 12, 2003.
Michael D. Dicembre, Orlando, for Appellant.
Charles J Crist, Jr., Attorney General, and Robin A. Compton, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.
2Per curiam
We affirm the denial of Appellant's rule 3.800(a) motion to correct illegal sentence. We base our decision on Hersey v. State, 831 So.2d 679 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002) (on grant of rehearing), and Carlson v. State, 27 Fla. L. Weekly D2162, ___ So.2d ___, 2002 WL 31202145 (Fla. 5th DCA…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
3Cases cited12 opinions
- Weaver v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Dobbert v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Heggs v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2000
- Lynce v. MathisSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Taylor v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by3 opinions
- Hazley v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003
- Morancy v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003
- Santana v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003