Legal Opinion

Herbert v. United States

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided June 1, 1987No. 86 Civ. 5377 (CLB)PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

BRIEANT, Chief Judge.

This is an action against the Government filed by plaintiffs Carol M. Herbert and Henry W. Herbert, cosignatories of a joint tax return, seeking a refund of $12,752.70 1 in federal income tax, claimed to have been wrongfully assessed and collected from plaintiffs by the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) for the tax year 1982. Jurisdiction arises under 28 U.S.C. § 1346(a)(1).

The parties have filed motions for summary judgment, which were fully submitted to this Court for a decision on April 6, 1987, upon receipt of a letter from the plaintiffs reporting…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Commissioner v. DubersteinSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  2. Heckler v. Community Health Services of Crawford County, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Commissioner v. Glenshaw Glass Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
  4. United States v. LockeSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Schweiker v. HansenSupreme Court of the United States · 1981

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. United States v. Red Stripe, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1992
  2. Martin v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1988
  3. Carol M. Herbert and Henry W. Herbert v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988
  4. Diamond v. Federal Emergency Management AgencyDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1988
  5. Slattery v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1988

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API