Legal Opinion

Janney v. Arlan's Department Store

District Court, W.D. Virginia

Decided November 15, 1965No. Civ. A. No. 65-C-29-RPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DALTON, Chief Judge.

This is an action for malicious prosecution based upon the theory that defendant caused, without justification, the arrest of the plaintiff. The pertinent facts are as follows:

On or about December 12, 1964, Jacqueline Maines Janney, while in Ar-lan’s Department Store, picked up several articles of merchandise which she had in her possession. She contends that she intended to purchase these, and there is conflict as to whether she concealed the merchandise in her handbag or whether she chose to carry it over her arm, with the handbag in her hand.

Mrs. Janney was requested by…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Freezer v. MillerSupreme Court of Virginia · 1934
  2. Ricketts v. J. G. McCrory Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1924
  3. Wiggs v. FarmerSupreme Court of Virginia · 1964
  4. Saunders v. BaldwinSupreme Court of Virginia · 1911
  5. Brodie v. HuckSupreme Court of Virginia · 1948

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. NJ Manufacturers Insurance Co. v. BrowerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1978
  2. Marsh v. Commercial and Savings Bank of Winchester, Va.District Court, W.D. Virginia · 1967
  3. Brodie v. Hawaii Automotive Retail Gasoline Dealers Ass'nHawaii Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Travelers Indemnity Company v. WalburnDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1974
  5. State Farm Fire & Casualty Company v. Joseph Martin Radcliff and Coastal Property Management LLC, a/k/a CPM Construction of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2013

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API