Legal Opinion

People v. Pangelina

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 15, 1984No. AO20981PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

HANING, J.

Defendant Jerome Cornelius Pangelina appeals from a conviction of murder in the second degree (Pen. Code, § 187) and use of a deadly weapon in the commission thereof (Pen. Code, § 12022, subd. (b)) on the ground he was denied competent counsel. We conclude that he received competent legal assistance and uphold the conviction.

The distressing facts reveal that on the evening of the murder, shortly after midnight, Lilly Day left the home of her sister, Opal McDaniel, to walk to a nearby convenience store. Day’s niece, watching her aunt from the window, saw a car drive past Day,…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. People v. WheelerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  2. People v. MarsdenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  3. People v. PopeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  4. People v. FosselmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
  5. People v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. People v. JenningsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  2. People v. MitchamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  3. People v. McFarlandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
  4. People v. Hall, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
  5. People v. JenningsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API