Stickel v. Stoddard
Supreme Court of Kansas
Error from Greenwood District Court. Action brought by Mary F. Stickel and John Culler, to perpetually enjoin the defendants, the road overseer, the township trustee and the board of county commissioners, from removing the plaintiff’s fence, and opening what the defendants claim to be a public highway across the plaintiff’s land.
Read the full summary
Error from Greenwood District Court. Action brought by Mary F. Stickel and John Culler, to perpetually enjoin the defendants, the road overseer, the township trustee and the board of county commissioners, from removing the plaintiff’s fence, and opening what the defendants claim to be a public highway across the plaintiff’s land. The case was tried by the court below without a jury, and the court made special findings of fact and conclusions of law, as follows: FINDINGS OF FACT: “1. At the time, of the beginning of the said action, the defendant H. L. Stoddard was the legally elected,…
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Valentine, J.:
This action was brought by Mary F. Stickel and John Culler, to perpetually enjoin the defendants, the road overseer, the township trustee, and the board of county commissioners, from removing the plaintiffs’ fence, and opening what the defendants claim to be a public highway across the plaintiffs’ land. It is admitted by the parties that in July, 1871, this highway was duly and legally located and established as a public county road by the board of county commissioners of Greenwood county, and that the county board duly ordered that it be…
2Cited by5 opinions
- Shanline v. WiltsieSupreme Court of Kansas · 1904
- Wilson v. JanesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1883
- City of Topeka v. RussamSupreme Court of Kansas · 1883
- Clark v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1912
- Rule v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1922