Legal Opinion
Stewart v. Hickman
District Court, W.D. Missouri
Decided January 8, 1941No. 699Published
1Opinion of the Court
36 F.Supp. 861 (1941)
STEWART
v.
HICKMAN et al.
No. 699.
District Court, W. D. Missouri, W. D.
January 3, 1941.
On Rehearing January 8, 1941.
Joseph N. Miniace, of Kansas City, for plaintiff.
Langworthy & Matz, H. M. Langworthy, Carl D. Matz, and Wm. H. Hoffstot, Jr., all of Kansas City, Mo., for defendant.
REEVES, District Judge.
This case was removed from a state court. Although both parties concede the jurisdiction of the federal court, nevertheless such jurisdiction should be questioned. The suit is for damages under the Fair Labor Standards Act. The aggregate amount sued for is $2,192.06. Section…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Devine v. Los AngelesSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
- Arkansas v. Kansas & Texas Coal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1901
- Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Ann Arbor RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Bankers Mutual Casualty Co. v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Sainte Marie Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1904
- Stewart v. HickmanDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1941
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.