Legal Opinion

Bern v. Camejo

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided January 8, 2014No. 3D12-2436PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEmas, J.

Kazandra Bern (“Bern” or “Plaintiff’) appeals the trial court’s order denying a motion for new trial. The issue is whether the trial court erred in permitting the Defendants to introduce evidence and argue to the jury that one of the trial witnesses had been sued and was originally named as a defendant in the case, in violation of section 768.041(3), Florida Statutes (2012). For the reasons that follow, we reverse and remand for a new trial.

This case involves a three-car collision at the intersection of Northeast 135th Street and Biscayne Boulevard in Miami. The three drivers were Bern,…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Fabre v. MarinSupreme Court of Florida · 1993
  2. Ladner v. PLAZA DEL PRADO, ETC.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
  3. Ed Ricke & Sons v. Green by and Through SwanSupreme Court of Florida · 1985
  4. Webb v. PriestDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
  5. City of Coral Gables v. JordanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1966

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Sam Sugar v. in Re:sternDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015
  2. WILLIAM HERNANDEZ v. CGI WINDOWS AND DOORS, INC.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API