Legal Opinion · Dissent

Estate of Elliott Ex Rel. Elliott v. a & B Welding Supply Co.

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided May 12, 1999No. NonePublished

1DissentAmundson, Justice

[¶25.] How can we find that fraud is speculative as to A & B Welding, but not with regard to Dakota Welding? I would hold that we cannot, and would affirm the trial court’s decision granting summary judgment.

[¶ 26.] The essential elements of fraud are:

[T]hat a representation was made as a statement of fact, which was untrue and known to be untrue by the party making it, or else recklessly made; that it was made with intent to deceive and for the *711purpose of inducing the other party to act upon it; and that he [or she] did in fact rely on it and was induced thereby to act to his [or her] injury…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Ginter v. Palmer & Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1978
  2. Dahl v. SittnerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Moody v. St. Charles CountyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994
  4. Taggart v. Ford Motor Credit Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Allen v. Biltmore Tissue Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1957

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API