Estate of Elliott Ex Rel. Elliott v. a & B Welding Supply Co.
South Dakota Supreme Court
1DissentAmundson, Justice
[¶25.] How can we find that fraud is speculative as to A & B Welding, but not with regard to Dakota Welding? I would hold that we cannot, and would affirm the trial court’s decision granting summary judgment.
[¶ 26.] The essential elements of fraud are:
[T]hat a representation was made as a statement of fact, which was untrue and known to be untrue by the party making it, or else recklessly made; that it was made with intent to deceive and for the *711purpose of inducing the other party to act upon it; and that he [or she] did in fact rely on it and was induced thereby to act to his [or her] injury…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Ginter v. Palmer & Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1978
- Dahl v. SittnerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
- Moody v. St. Charles CountyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994
- Taggart v. Ford Motor Credit Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
- Allen v. Biltmore Tissue Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1957
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.