Paden v. Murray
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Blackburn, Presiding Judge.
In this action regarding the purchase and sale of a residential home, the buyer, Dr. Scott W. Paden, appeals the trial court’s grant of summary judgment to the sellers, William and Jean Murray, contending that: (1) the sales agreement should have been considered rescinded; (2) the Murrays fraudulently concealed latent defects in the home they sold to him; (3) the Murrays breached the sales agreement by failing to disclose defects in the home; and (4) Mr. Murray negligently constructed the home. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm the grant of summary judgment…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Matjoulis v. Integon General Ins. Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
- Williams v. RunionCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1984
- Akins v. CouchSupreme Court of Georgia · 1999
- Owens v. Union City Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1993
- Cotton v. Bank SouthCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1998
3Cited by10 opinions
- Preferred Real Estate Equities, Inc. v. Housing Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2001
- Ainsworth v. PerreaultCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2002
- Conway v. RomarionCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2001
- Lakeside Investments Group, Inc. v. AllenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2002
- Young v. Oak Leaf Builders, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2006
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.