Legal Opinion

Sanders v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided November 5, 2003No. 1742-02PublishedCited by 281 opinions

1Opinion of the Court 1

OPINION

2Opinion of the Court · HeryeyHeryey, J.

in which KELLER, P.J., KEASLER, HOLCOMB and COCHRAN, JJ., joined.

In this case we decide that the Court of Appeals misapplied the Jackson v. Virginia legal sufficiency standard of review in holding that the evidence was legally insufficient to support a jury’s verdict convicting appellant of burglary. See generally Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307, 99 S.Ct. 2781, 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979).

The evidence showed that on the morning of July 17, 2000, the complainant discovered that one of his furnished but vacant rent houses had been burglarized. Earlier that morning, a neighbor saw a heavy…

3Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Johnson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000
  3. Clewis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1996
  4. Tibbs v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982

4Cited by281 opinions

  1. Ozuna v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2006
  2. Russo v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2007
  3. Hartman v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2006
  4. Ramirez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2007
  5. King v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2005

276 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API