Rosamond v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
The opinion states the case.
1Opinion
ON MOTION FOR REHEARING
HAWKINS, Judge.
Appellant’s motion for rehearing questions our former opinion in the disposition of the points raised by bills of exception four, five and eleven. The first bill referred to shows that the court refused to withdraw from the jury prosecutrix’s statement that appellant took her to Terrell. We think appellant’s contention that the statement carried an implication of another act of intercourse is not sound. At most it only showed association with prosecutrix subsequent to the act of carnal knowledge shown by the State in developing its ease in chief. We are…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Crosslin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1921
- Johnson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1922
- Battles v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1908
- Wright v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1924
- Rosamond v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1924
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.