Legal Opinion

Gurchick v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided October 26, 1983No. 83-1551PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OTT, Chief Judge.

Stephen Francis Gurchick appeals the trial court’s summary denial of his motion for postconviction relief under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850.1

In point one of the motion, appellant alleged that he was sentenced without legal counsel present and without an effective waiver of his right to counsel.

A review of the sentencing transcript reveals the following conversation between the court and appellant:

THE COURT: You are here for sentencing today, Mr. Gurchick. Your attorney is not here. Do you want him here?

THE DEFENDANT: I don’t believe it would affect it, Your Honor.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Williams v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
  2. Morgano v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
  3. Mullins v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
  4. Gurchick v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
  5. James v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hayes v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990
  2. Lockwood v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
  3. Brown v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
  4. Gurchick v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API