Legal Opinion

Pikas v. Williams Companies, Inc.

District Court, N.D. Oklahoma

Decided October 19, 2012No. Case No. 8-cv-101-GKF-PJCPublished

1Opinion of the Court

*1221 OPINION AND ORDER

GREGORY K. FRIZZELL, Chief Judge.

This matter comes before the court upon plaintiff class’s Motion for Judgment on Liability [Dkt. # 111] and defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment on Liability [Dkt. # 113]. Both motions address whether defendants Williams Companies Inc. and Williams Pension Plan (“Williams”) are liable to plaintiff class (“Class”) under ERISA, 29 U.S.C. § 1002 et seq., for providing cost of living adjustments (“COLAs”) to annuitants but not for those who took a lump sum payment in lieu of their annuity. Because the COLAs are part of the accrued benefit,…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Johnnie L. Evans v. McDonald Corporation, a Delaware Corporation McDonald of Claremore, a Defunct Oklahoma Corporation David McMahanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
  3. Michael v. CATERPILLAR FINANCIAL SERVICESSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
  4. Terry T. Penn v. Howe-Baker Engineers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
  5. Foster v. PPG Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API