Legal Opinion

Brown v. Ulrich

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided May 6, 1896No. 6548PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from tbe district court of Hamilton county. Heard below before Bates, J.

1Opinion of the Court

Irvine, C.

This was an action by S. S. Brown, as the vendee under a contract for the sale of land, to enforce the specific performance of that contract. The defendants are Valentine Ulrich and wife, Charles E. Ulrich, and H. S. Brown. The petition alleges that Charles E. Ulrich, April 2, 1886, was the owner of the land in controversy, and on that day he entered into a contract in writing with the plaintiff and H. S. Broivn, in the name of H. S. Brown alone, whereby he sold and agreed to convey the land to the plaintiff and H. S. Brown for the sum of $4,800, with interest at eight per cent,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Morgan v. BergenNebraska Supreme Court · 1874
  2. Merriam v. GoodlettNebraska Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Missouri River, Fort Scott & Gulp Railroad v. BrickleySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1878
  4. Patterson v. MurphyNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Langan v. ThummelNebraska Supreme Court · 1888

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Jones v. Mississippi Farms Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Dodge ex rel. Dodge v. GalushaNebraska Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Shonsey v. ClaytonNebraska Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Whiteman v. PerkinsNebraska Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Rath v. WilgusNebraska Supreme Court · 1923

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API