Legal Opinion
Mellen v. Hutchins
Monroe County Court
Decided March 15, 1880PublishedCited by 1 opinion
Application by respondent for commission to take testimony, and by appellant for security for costs.
1Opinion of the Court
Morgan, Special County Judge.
The respondent resides at Worcester, Mass.; the appellant in the city of Rochester, *3501ST. T. The action was brought by long summons in the municipal court of the city of Eochester, which is not a court of record. Judgment was recovered in favor of the respondent, and from that judgment the appellant appeals to this court. The respondent applied for a commission to take her own testimony in Massachusetts, and that of a witness in Akron, Ohio, under section 887 et seq of Code. Upon the hearing of that application, the appellant objected that the respondent should file…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Traver v. NicholsNew York Supreme Court · 1831
- Fenno v. DickinsonNew York Supreme Court · 1847
- People ex rel. Tomb v. Judges of the county of WashingtonNew York Supreme Court · 1823
3Cited by1 opinion
- McMurray v. LiddellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1929