Legal Opinion

Opinion No.

Arkansas Attorney General Reports

Decided June 27, 1996Published

1Opinion of the Court

The Honorable Sharon Priest Secretary of State State Capitol Little Rock, Arkansas 72201-1094

Dear Ms. Priest:

This is in response to your request for an opinion on the following two questions:

1. When will the judgeships created by the 80th General Assembly be subject to re-election?

2. When will the judgeships of the judicial subdistricts created by the consent decree in Hunt, et al. v. Clinton, et al., PB-C-89-406, be subject to re-election?

With respect to your first question, the Eightieth General Assembly, by Acts 39, 41, and 170 of 1995,1 created one new circuit-chancery judgeship in each…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Missouri v. JenkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. Reynoldsville Casket Co. v. HydeSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  3. State ex rel. Smith v. AskewSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1886
  4. Howell v. Howell Stevens v. StevensSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1948
  5. Waddle v. SargentSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API