Yellow Freight System, Inc. v. Commonwealth
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge Wilkinson, Jr.,
The difficult question raised in this appeal from the dismissal of a petition to terminate a compensation agreement is whether an employer can be restricted in proving the availability of work, within a claimant’s physical limitations, to the area of the .claimant’s present residence as opposed to the area where he worked at the time of his injury. The Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Board) affirmed a referee’s decision which considered only the area of the claimant’s present residence. We affirm.
Respondent was employed by petitioner as a dock-man in…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board of the Commonwealth v. State Workmen's Insurance FundCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board v. DennyCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
3Cited by17 opinions
- Tim Neal v. Annett Holdings, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2012
- Titusville Hospital v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
- Republic Steel Corp. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- Webster v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- City of Pittsburgh/PMA Management Corp. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.