Reed v. State

The writ of error brings for review judgment of conviction of the offense of larceny of a hog.

The sole question presented is whether or not the evidence is sufficient to sustain the judgment. We realize that the credibility and weight to be given evidence is a question for the jury’s determination. McDonald v. State, 56 Fla. 74, 47 Sou. 485; Tucker v. State, 86 Fla. 36, 96 Sou. 10; Capello v. State, 82 Fla. 313, 90 Sou. 191.

We have carefully considered the evidence as presented in the record and find that it is unsatisfactory as to the identity of the alleged stolen hog. The evidence of…